State v. Rosen

Pee Ctjbxam.

There having been a dissent in the Appellate Division, defendant appealed to ns as of right. B. 2:2-l (a). The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in its majority opinion. 110 N. J. Super. 216 (App. Div. 1969).

Defendant was ably represented by experienced counsel. His unparticularized allegation that counsel was ineffective is meaningless. Defendant’s sole factual assertion relevant on this post-conviction application is that his counsel said that if defendant insisted upon new counsel, his bail would “probably” be revoked. If it were accepted as…