Legal Opinion

Bottorff v. O'Donnell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1980No. 12431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*607OPINION

2Per curiam

In this original proceeding, petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directed to the district court requiring that summary judgment in his favor be granted. See Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345, 393 P.2d 610 (1964); NRAP 3A(b)(5).

From the limited record before us, it appears that petitioner and his ex-wife, while married, purchased a home. As part of the subsequent divorce decree, the ex-wife was awarded the house and agreed to assume all the obligations on it. However, no effort was made to change the title.

Subsequently the house was sold. Due to a failure to detect a mortgage on the house,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ash Springs Development Corp. v. O'DonnellNevada Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jeaness v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. CLARK CNTY. v. DIST. CT. (EGGLESTON)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Laborers' Int'l. Union of N. America, Local 169 v. Office of the Labor Comm'r.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API