Legal Opinion

Tesmer v. Boehm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The appellant is a manufacturer of furniture. The appellee worked for him on a machine called a shaper, which it is unnecessary to describe, but which the appellee in his testimony said is a dangerous machine to work at.

He had worked at such machines before. He testified that when he first went to the machine Avith the appellant, he saw that the top—a table—was cracked, rough, and in bad condition; and told the appellant that if he Avanted to turn out good work on the shaper he would have to fix the top; and that the appellant said that he had the lumber for the top in the drying room, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Legnard v. LageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Althardt v. Consolidated Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  2. Cantwell v. John Brennan & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Towler v. New Jersey Adamant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Western Electric Co. v. ProchaskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API