Legal Opinion

Rache v. Stanley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe Fifth district court. Hon. E. V. Higgins, Judge. Action by Nellie T. Bache against W. B. Stanley, as receiver of the partnership of Thompson Bros., and Sarah S. Thompson, as administratrix of the estate of E. W. Thompson. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Thompson appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bartoh, J.:

This action was brought against W. B. Stanley, as receiver of the partnership of Thompson Bros., and against the appellants, Sarah S. Thompson, as adminis-tratrix of the estate of E. W. Thompson, Jr., and Sarah S. Thompson, as a private person, to foreclose a mortgage executed by E. W. Thompson, Jr., since deceased, to E. W. Thompson, Sr., to secure a promissory note. It is alleged in the complaint that on February lo, 1890, E. W. Thompson, Jr., made and delivered to E. W. Thompson, Sr., a promissory note for $2,000, due in six months after date, and secured the same by mortgage on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Belleville Pump & Skein Works v. SamuelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Blyth & Fargo Co. v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API