Legal Opinion
Stickles v. Reichardt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
On behalf of the plaintiff it is contended :
“I. The defendants’ promise to allow the plaintiff to see and visit the child was supported by valid consideration.
“II. Equity should compel specific performance of the defendants’ promise because the legal remedy of damages would be an inappropriate and inadequate remedy for the breach.
“III. The order of adoption did not release the defendants’ promise regarding visitation of the child.
“IV. The defendants’ promise is sufficiently certain to support a decree of specific performance.
“V. The amount of judicial supervision required for enforcement of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Carlson v. MacCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Custody of HSHKWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Poe v. CaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Sporleder v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Holtmann v. KnottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Adoption of RDSWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.