Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taylor v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2013No. 2009-CT-00669-SCTPublished

1DissentChandler, Justice

¶ 28. I respectfully dissent. In this Court’s most recent pronouncement on crimes that are per se violent under Mississippi Code Section 99-19-83, we held that “we will not place a ‘violent crime’ label on a crime where there was no proof of a violent act, unless the statute itself— or some other provision of law (such as the definitions within the chapter that include the statute) — clearly and unambiguously requires us to do so.” Brown v. State, 102 So.3d 1087, 1089 (Miss.2012). Taylor’s crime of “sexual intercourse with a child underage” is not defined by any statute identified by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duplantis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Seely v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dalgo v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API