Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 1969No. 3 Div. 430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Appeal by defendant Wiley from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Wilson for one hundred dollars, statutory penalty for cutting trees on lands of plaintiff. Title 47, § 272, Code of Alabama 1940, as last amended.

Defendant contends that there are two issues presented on this appeal: First, did plaintiff own the land and trees he sued *616defendant for cutting; secondly, did defendant willfully and intentionally cut the trees knowing they were the property of plaintiff.

We have carefully considered the assignments of error and issues raised thereby and have concluded that these two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. White, McLane & Morris v. FarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Butts v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Parrish v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Alabama Music Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cambron v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Dees v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Peterson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Mizell v. Container Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API