Matter of Marshall
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
This matter comes before us on the Disciplinary Commission’s Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action, by which the Commission charges respondent Albert E. Marshall, Jr., with eight counts of attorney misconduct, including forgery and conversion of client funds. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(ll)(b), this Court appointed a hearing officer who, after evidentiary hearing, submitted his findings of fact and conclusions of law, therein finding that respondent engaged in misconduct as charged. Respondent has petitioned this Court for review of the hearing…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of CawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re FleenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- In The Matter of Michael A. FleenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998