Bland v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
563 So.2d 794 (1990)
Larry BLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2693.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 21, 1990.
James A. Johnston, Pensacola, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
NIMMONS, Judge.
Bland appeals from an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion. No evidentiary hearing was held. However, it is apparent from the record herein that the trial court, in denying the motion, took into consideration the transcript of the trial testimony. Such transcript is a part of the record herein and is…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State v. AbreauSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Blanco v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whitfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Oehling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Guisasola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Boutwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Straitwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.