Legal Opinion

People v. Mack

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*307OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald Sheindlin, J.

The defendant moves for dismissal of the above-captioned indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a) claiming the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action. The People oppose in their answering affirmation claiming that they have satisfied their statutory obligations. A crucial issue of first impression was presented to the court: whether the adult victim’s psychological trauma constituted emotional unavailability, thereby rendering certain time periods excludable as an exceptional circumstance pursuant to CPL…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ZirpolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re EsworthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. CelestinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. LashwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. PomalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. ValentinNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API