Legal Opinion

Aguila v. Becton and Dickinson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 13, 2023No. 5:22-cv-06670Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RAMON AGUILA, Case No. 5:22-cv-06670-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 10 v. DISMISS CLASS ACTION CLAIMS 11 BECTON AND DICKINSON, et al., RRee:: DDoocckkeett NNooss.. 1166,, 2277 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, Ramon Aguila (“Aguila” or “Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others 14 similarly situated, initiated this employment lawsuit against Defendants Becton Dickinson and 15 Company (“Becton Dickinson”)1 and Apidel Technologies, LLC (“Apidel”) (collectively…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API