Legal Opinion

In re Markuson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1895PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Original application by Norman Markuson for discharge from custody on writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, C. J.

On June 29, 1895,, petitioner, with others, was convicted of a contempt of court, in violating the terms of an injunctional order issued out of the District Court for the County of Barnes, under section 13 of the act of 1890, known as the “Prohibition Law.” At the close of the testimony, and after the court had announced that it would find the accused guilty of the contempt charged, and before judgment was pronounced, counsel for the defendants gave notice in open court that they would remove the cases to the Supreme Court for review, and requested *181sufficient time in which a bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re StricklerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. State v. VossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Ex parte RobertsNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  4. State v. MarkusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Boenert v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Miller v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Ex Parte ClendenningCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Ex parte BuggMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API