Legal Opinion

State v. Cumber

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 25, 1986No. 85-1611-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, J.

The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing an inculpatory statement given to the police by the defendant-respondent, John F. Cumber. The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in determining that the statement, though not coerced, was nonetheless involuntary when viewed in light of the totality of the circumstances. We are satisfied that there was no error and affirm.

Cumber, a nineteen-year old man of limited intelligence, was questioned by police with regard to a complaint that he had had sexual contact with a person under the age of twelve years. The offense is a Class B…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Procunier v. AtchleySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WallisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. State v. IvesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. State v. IvesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API