Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Emmerich

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 5116; No. 2699 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County, lion. Booth M. Malone, Judge. Action by Emma Emmericb against Andrew Wliitebead and Edwin K. Wliitebead, copartners under tbe firm name of Wliitebead Brothers. From, a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steele

Action was brought hy Emma. Emmerich against the partnership known as Whitehead Brothers, upon a promissory note for the sum of $840.00, dated June 1, 1899. The note as copied in the complaint is as follows:

“$840.00 Denver, Colorado, June 1st, 1899.
“One year after date.I promise to pay to the order of Mrs. Emma Emmerich Eight Hundred and Forty 00-100 Dollars, payable at the office of Whitehead Brothers, Denver, Colorado, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum after date until paid. Interest payable semi-annually. Value received.
“Due 6-1, 1900. Whitehead Bros.”

Then follows this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knuppel v. MorelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. LeDoux v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Klundby v. HogdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API