Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnson v. United Services Automobile Assoc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1977No. 5980Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDomengeaux, Judge

For the reasons assigned in my concurring and dissenting opinion in the companion case of Petite v. Richardson, et al., 347 So.2d 23, our docket number 5979, I would affirm the trial court judgment which held that the sole proximate cause of the accident herein was the negligence of Mrs. Richardson. Accordingly, I would affirm the awards granted Mr. and Mrs. Johnson.

Concerning the award of $750.00 made to the passenger in the Johnson vehicle, Au-drie Johnson, I disagree with the majority opinion that she is not entitled to any recompense. I do agree that the extent of her emotional trauma and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Speight v. Southern Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Petite v. RichardsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API