Ficke v. Ficke
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Nordmanser vs. Hitchcock, 40 Mo., 182; Sto. Eq. PI., § 398; Wilson vs. Bodlev, 2Litt.. 55 ; Sharp vs. Pike, 5 B. Mon., 155; Meyer vs. Field, 37 Mo., 441; Corby vs. Dean. 44 Mo., 381; Ch. Pr.
Read the full summary
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Nordmanser vs. Hitchcock, 40 Mo., 182; Sto. Eq. PI., § 398; Wilson vs. Bodlev, 2Litt.. 55 ; Sharp vs. Pike, 5 B. Mon., 155; Meyer vs. Field, 37 Mo., 441; Corby vs. Dean. 44 Mo., 381; Ch. Pr. Act, art. 2, § 14; E. C. 1835, p. 509, Id., 1815, art. 2, § 23, p. 812; Ryan vs. Ryan, 9 Mo., 539 ; Nagel vs. Nagel, 12 Mo.’, 53. cited Enderkin vs. Fitch, 2 Ind., 90; Stoner vs. Stoner, 9 Ind., 505; Slason vs.'Wright, 14 Yt... 208; Kemp vs. Mack-well, 3 Atk., 811; Sto. Eq. PL, 5th ed., 375, § 399; 2 Barb. Ch. Pr., 127; Field vs. Schieffelin, 7 Johns. Chy., 252;…
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge
This was a petition by the wife for a divorce from her husband on various grounds. The answer denied all the allegations of the petition, and, alleging various statutory causes, asked a divorce on his part. A replication was filed, and the case was set for trial, the plaintiff not appearing, but the defendant appeared and answered to the cause, and the court proceeded to hear the proofs offered by defendant, and having first dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, gave a judgment and decree of divorce for the defendant on his cross-bill. On the following day of the term the plaintiff moved for. a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nordmanser v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Phelps v. PhelpsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Watkins v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Arndt v. ArndtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Heman v. McNamaraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.