Hulda Schoening Family Trust v. Powertel/Kentucky Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HEYBURN, Chief Judge.
Defendants GTE Wireless, Inc. (“GTE”) and Crown Communications, Inc. (“Crown”), have moved this Court to alter, amend or vacate its April 1, 2003, order. The Court has carefully considered the arguments presented by both sides. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will alter its order and deny the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment as to Count II. 1
I
Defendants first contend that the Court should vacate its previous order because it fails to give effect to certain lease provisions and therefore does not construe the contract by giving…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frear v. P.T.A. Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Louisa v. NewlandKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Parrish v. NewburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Cook United, Inc. v. WaitsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- Central Bank & Trust Co. v. KincaidKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. HargisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Imagetec, L.P. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Members Heritage Credit Union v. New York Marine & General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Schall v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Wesley A. Collins v. Wendall L. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024