Hart v. Warder
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
Appellee, plaintiff below, brought this action to recover the sum of $500 as commission for the sale of certain personal property belonging to appellant. In response to a motion to make more definite and certain, it was admitted that the contract of employment is oral.
The cause was tried to the court and the findings material to a decision are substantially as follows: During the latter part of the year 1949, appellant-listed with appellee for sale his stock of merchandise consisting of hardware and furniture and agreed to pay a commission of 5% on the sales price.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Suburban Imp. Co. v. Scott Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Eaton v. SadlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Hutton v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Minks v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Safeway, Inc. v. Rooter 2000 Plumbing & Drain SSSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Safeway, Inc. v. Rooter 2000 Plumbing & Drain SSSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013