Security Sav. Bank of Marshalltown, Iowa v. United States
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HANSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court by way of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Though summary judgment is “an extreme remedy,” and “one which is not to be granted unless the movant has established his right to a judgment with such clarity as to leave no room for controversy,” the Court, having considered the parties’ briefs and exhibits, finds that defendant is entitled to such judgment. F.R.Civ.P. 56; Robert Johnson Grain Co. v. Chemical Interchange Co., 541 F.2d 207, 209 (8th Cir. 1976).
The essential facts are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robert Johnson Grain Company v. Chemical Interchange CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. KeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- State v. Eagle Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security National Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. Dentsply Professional PlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Apex Oil Co. v. Tims (In Re Armstrong)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Farns Associates, Inc. v. South Side BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Hanrahan v. Arcadia Financial Ltd. (In re Scott)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Sternco, Inc. v. Associates Leasing, Inc. (In Re Rose Way, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.