Legal Opinion

Williams v. Raper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Plaintiff held a chattel mortgage upon certain property executed by one Tracy, which was properly filed.

Defendant was a constable, and, as such, levied upon and sold the property covered by the mortgage.

The plaintiff brought this suit, declaring against said defendant on a plea of trespass upon the case.

In his declaration he averred the ownership of the property by Tracy, the indebtedness of Tracy to him, and the execution and filing of the chattel mortgage to secure such indebtedness. The declaration then proceeds as follows:

“ And the said defendant, well knowing the premises, and having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. McAdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hammond v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Theatre Equipment Acceptance Corp. v. BetmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API