Legal Opinion
Barr v. United States
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1976No. C-75-1071-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a federal prisoner at the Federal Reformatory, El Reno, Oklahoma, to which the respondents have filed a Motion to Dismiss. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to immediate release or other appropriate habeas relief because of errors in the determination of his parole eligibility and because the conditions of his confinement and lack of programs available to him defeat the purpose of the Youth Corrections Act.
Petitioner states that he was convicted after a jury trial of violation of § 841 of Title 21, United…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, New Yorkstate Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George B. Garcia v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States of America Ex Rel. Conrad A. Dancy v. Floyd E. Arnold, Warden United States Penitentiary Lewisburg, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Daniel Wayne Fronczak v. Warden, El Reno Reformatory, El Reno, Oklahoma and United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Smaldone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Phillips v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.