Legal Opinion

Summer & Co. v. DCR Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1976No. 75-952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

At issue in this cause is the manner in which a vendor of real property who takes a purchase money mortgage from the vendee establishes and preserves his preferential position in order to defeat the claims of *258persons asserting liens against the property. The Trustees of-Ohio Wesleyan University, appellants, maintain that the doctrine of simultaneous seizin applies under such circumstances. Appellants? position1'is based upon their interpretation of the doctrine which holds that “ [wjhere a deed of land is executed and) simultaneously therewith, the purchaser gives to the vendor a purchase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. YarboroughOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mahoning Park Co. v. Warren Home Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Romito Bros. Electric Construction Co. v. Frank A. Flannery, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Holgate State Bank v. GauggelOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bob DeGeorge Associates, Inc. v. Hawthorn BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Carolina Builders Corp. v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Deltro Electric Ltd. v. Electric Power Systems International, Inc.et alDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Gale v. Pattie Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Huntington National Bank of Columbus v. Treasurer of Franklin CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API