Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 2, 1900No. 612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. This action was brought by E. T. Wilson, as receiver of the First National Bank of Helena, Mont, to recover of the Merchants’ Doan & Trust Company, a banking corporation of Illinois, an assessment of $100 per share on one hundred and twenty shares of the stock of that bank, of which shares the bill alleges the trust company to have become the purchaser and…

Read the full summary

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. This action was brought by E. T. Wilson, as receiver of the First National Bank of Helena, Mont, to recover of the Merchants’ Doan & Trust Company, a banking corporation of Illinois, an assessment of $100 per share on one hundred and twenty shares of the stock of that bank, of which shares the bill alleges the trust company to have become the purchaser and owner at some time between December 1, 1894, and June 1, 1805. The pleas are: First, nil debit; second, denial of purchase…

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, Circuit Judge

It is urged by the defendant in error that the specifications of error call for an inquii’y into issues of fact, and present no question *691for review. Tlie response for the plaintiff in error is that the agreed statement of facts is to be treated as a special finding, on which the question arises whether the facts stated are sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered. It is well enough settled that an agreed statement of facts, on which judgment has been rendered, will be taken as the equivalent of a special finding. Supervisors v. Kinniott, 103 U. S. 554, 26 L. Ed. 486; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Anderson v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Surety Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API