Legal Opinion

Charles Bruce Nabors v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1990No. 90-1302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles Bruce Nabors appeals from the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate’s recommendation to dismiss Na-bors’s petition for habeas corpus relief and denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief. Because the district court did not conduct the required de novo review, we remand the case to the district court for further proceedings.

Nabors filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), which the district court referred to a magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate conducted an evidentiary hearing and issued proposed findings and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chester Patterson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Taylor v. FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ricky Lee Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Gary Hamell, A/K/A Gary Hamell-El, United States of America v. Douglas Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Cooperative Finance Ass'n, Inc. v. GarstDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. Jones v. PillowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Jones v. PillowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API