Legal Opinion

Farmer v. City of Newport

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 8, 1988No. 86-CA-385-MRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWERTON, Chief Judge.

Farmer and Dean appeal from an order of the Campbell Circuit Court issued pursuant to CR 12 dismissing their claims against approximately 100 mattress manufacturers to the extent that the claims were based on a theory of “enterprise liability” or “concert of action.” The court held that these theories did not state a cause of action in Kentucky, but it retained jurisdiction over all claims against any manufacturers who made the products which caused the injuries and deaths. We agree with the order of the trial court as it relates to the claim based on enterprise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Red Hed Oil, Inc. v. H.T. Hackney Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
  3. Peoples Bank of Northern Kentucky, Inc. v. CROWE CHIZEK AND CO.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  4. University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Miles Farm Supply, LLC v. Helena Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API