Rich Grove Township v. Emmett
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Pulaski Circuit Court; T. F. Palmer, Judge. John E. Emmett and others, petitioned in the circuit court for the establishment of a drain, and Robert J. Geddis and others filed a remonstrance against the report of the drainage commissioners. Erom a decree of the circuit court modifying said report, Rich Grove Township and others appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMonies, J.
Appellees commenced this proceeding August 6, 1902, in the court below, for the construction of a ditch under what is known as the circuit court drainage law. After the drainage commissioners filed their report, and within the time allowed by law, Robert J. Geddis and others, against whose lands benefits were assessed, each filed separate remonstrances, alleging the fifth, seventh, and eighth causes of remonstrance provided in §5625 Burns 1901. A trial of said cause resulted in a finding modifying and equalizing t'he benefits assessed by the drainage commissioners, and against each of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKee v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Haymaker v. SchneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Brown v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Mellott v. MessmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Vail v. LindsayIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Newman v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Souers v. WalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Laporte Land Co. v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- American Trust & Savings Bank v. GrippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.