Legal Opinion

State v. Looker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from, Lielcinson JDistrirt Court. Dink Looker, whose real name is unknown, was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor contrary to law. He appeals. The material facts appear in the opinion herein, filed November 10, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Dink Looker was charged in an information containing three counts with violations of the prohibitory liquor law, and he was convicted on the first and second counts. In each count it was charged that, although he was “not lawfully and in good faith engaged in the business of a druggist,” *228be did, at a certain time and place, sell intoxicating liquors. The defendant contended in the court below, and contends here, that the information was insufficient in failing to allege in aDy of the counts that the sales were made without a permit to sell…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API