Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1980No. 36775PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Chief Justice.

The burden of proof in an extradition case is on the person resisting extradition once the State has made a prima facie case that the extradition is proper. Hutson v. Stoner, 244 Ga. 52 (257 SE2d 538) (1979). The evidence here supports the habeas court’s ruling that the extradition papers are in order and that the petitioner is the person named in the proceedings. The summary nature of extradition does not deny petitioner due process. McCullough v. Stynchcombe, 243 Ga. 24 (252 SE2d 453) (1979).

Judgment affirmed,

All the Justices concur. Charles Crawford, District…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutson v. StonerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Gunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. McCullough v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Covert v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API