Legal Opinion

Krechel v. Mercer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, C.J.

The plaintiffs assign as error the refusal of the trial court to grant their motion for peremptory instructions in their favor.

All the evidence tends to show that G. E. Lee, the president of New Bern Tractor & Equipment Company, the grantor in the deed involved, consented to the alteration, striking out Lot No. 3 from the exceptive clause in the deed, and that his consent was indicated by his signature on the margin of said deed beside the alteration.

The plaintiffs’ evidence tends to show that the alteration was made before delivery of the deed and payment of the consideration therefor. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe on Demise of Campbell v. DoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
  2. Malarin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. McKee v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830
  4. Howell v. . ClomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Martin v. . BuffaloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowden v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Newell v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API