Legal Opinion

Long v. Abbruzzetti

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 6, 1997No. Record 961815PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a plaintiff who recovered consequential damages for breach of contract presented sufficient evidence that those damages were within the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made.

Francesco Abbruzzetti (the plaintiff) filed a motion for judgment against Stefan C. Long, seeking damages for Long’s alleged breach of his oral contract to act as escrow agent for the plaintiff and his former wife, Josephine Wendy Abbruzzetti. The plaintiff and Long filed cross-motions for summary judgment and agreed, pursuant to Rule 3:18, that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. CARSON BY MEREDITH v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  2. W. S. Carnes, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  3. Hiss v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  4. Roanoke Hospital Ass'n v. Doyle & Russell, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. Ravenwood Towers, Inc. v. WoodyardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hitachi Credit America Corp. v. Signet BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Carnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. Rogers v. DeaneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  4. Virginia Electric and Power Co v. Bransen Energy, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  5. Acken v. Kroger Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API