Legal Opinion

United States v. Eckstein

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1912No. 743PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26216 (T. D. 31788).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise the subject of this importation is given by the importers the trade name of visceíline. It is manufactured by covering a single cotton thread with a coating of cellulose or viscose, material produced" from wood pulp. Its manufacture is described as follows: Cotton yarn is dyed, then drawn through a viscose bath that gives it a lustrous coating, and then redyed. It is run on spools and imported in that form. The present importation differs from glazed or coated cotton yarn in that the latter is given a bath in starch and then polished by brushing. ' The present importation is…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kessler v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API