Dorsey v. . Corbett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
We will not consider the assignments of error seriatim, and only the material ones.
The defendants complain that the court below allowed the plaintiff to amend his pleadings after all the evidence was in and the argument had begun. Plaintiff, in the complaint, alleged: “That by the terms of said contract, the plaintiff was to receive 5% commission of the amount said property brought when same was sold.” The amendment allowed “whether by plaintiff, Mrs. W. C. Corbett, or by another person.” Bearing on this, plaintiff testified: “I am a real-estate agent in the town of Shelby, and exhibit here…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Talley v. Harriss Granite Quarries Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- American Trust Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Martin v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Reams v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Norfolk & Southern Railroad v. DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Tise v. . Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Thomas v. Piedmont Realty & Development Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Lipe v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Harris v. . BuieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.