Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Harris County

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1922No. 3162PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

For a comprehensive statement of the case, we take the following from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals:

“Harris county, through its district attorney and county attorney, filed this suit against H. M. Curtin, formerly tax collector of Harris county, for the recovery of certain moneys which were alleged to be due by Mr. Curtin as excess fees of office. The state of Texas, through the Attorney General, intervened, claiming a portion of these moneys to be due the state.
“Mr. Curtin became tax collector of Harris county in April, 1917, for the purpose of filling an unexpired term, and held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtin v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Sherman County v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bitter v. County.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Limestone County v. RobbinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Cameron County v. FoxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Limestone County v. RobbinsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cameron County v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API