Burrus v. Hendricks
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Pike Circuit Court. — Hon. E. B. Woolfolk, Judge. The record in this case is fatally defective in that there is no showing from the record proper of the filing or overruling of a motion for a new trial, the rendition of a final judgment, the allowance of an appeal, or the allowance of the signing or filing of a bill of exceptions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pike Circuit Court. — Hon. E. B. Woolfolk, Judge. The record in this case is fatally defective in that there is no showing from the record proper of the filing or overruling of a motion for a new trial, the rendition of a final judgment, the allowance of an appeal, or the allowance of the signing or filing of a bill of exceptions. Tracy v. Tracy, 201 S. W. (Mo.) 902; Squares v. Peters, 202 S. W. (Mo.) 530; Livasy v. Jackson, 204 S. W. (Mo.) 186; Fleiger v. U. R. Co., 204.S. W. (Mo.) 182; O Tiara v. Berthold, 204 S. W. (Mo.) 1089, 1090; Harding v. Bedoll, 200 Mo.'625, 634; Bower v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pike County. On March 23, 1921, appellant served upon the respondent her abstract of the record and brief herein. On March 30, 1921, respondent served upon appellant his written objections to said abstract of the record, in words and figures as follows:
"In the Supreme Court of Missouri. "Division No. 1. "April Term, 1921. "IDA BURRUS, Appellant | v. Case No. 22,184. "VALENTINE HENDRICKS, Respondent. |
"RESPONDENT'S OBJECTION TO APPELLANT'S ABSTRACT.
"Now comes Valentine Hendricks, respondent in the above-entitled cause, and makes the following objection to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bower v. DanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- City of St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. DeemarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Peters v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Warner v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Beatty v. Zeigel and EllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942