People v. Sweeney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the memorandum, and defendant remanded to Niagara County Court for resentencing. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the second degree cannot be sustained because the People failed to prove that the value of the stolen property exceeded $1,500. The only proof of value was the victim’s estimate of the value of the various items stolen from *979him. Although evidence of original cost may be supplied by a victim (see, People v Carter, 19 NY2d 967), such evidence is not sufficient proof of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HaroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. Van EttenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. SelassieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ShareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. WickhamNew York Supreme Court · 2005