Legal Opinion · Dissent
Capitol Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 22, 1958No. Nos. 14034, 14162, 14043, 14160Published
1DissentDanaher, Circuit Judge
I quite agree that Oklahoma lacks standing, as my colleagues have ruled, but I dissent otherwise.
The situation presented is a by-product of the vexatious problem of “intermix-ture” and “de-intermixture” of VHF and UHF, various aspects of which previously have been presented to us. On June 26, 1956, following a general rule-making proceeding, the Commission issued a Report and Order (13 RR 1571) asserting that UHF and VHF could not effectively compete in the same area and that the 1952 intermixture policy had proved mistaken. The Commission considered making New Orleans all UHF. It also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Music Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Great Trails Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.