Mt. Holly Ski Area v. U.S. Electrical Motors
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PHILIP PRATT, Chief Judge.
Mt. Holly Ski Area brings this diversity action against Emerson Electric Company and General Electric Supply Company (GESCO) asserting negligence and breach of implied and express warranties under the Michigan Uniform Commercial Code. GESCO now brings this motion for summary judgment on all counts of Mt. Holly’s complaint.
A court may enter summary judgment on a claim if the record shows that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1993
- Pack v. Damon Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.