Legal Opinion

Committee for a Better Arvin v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2015No. 11-73924, 12-71332PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners, a contingent of environmental and community groups, bring serious challenges to the State of California’s plans to improve air quality in the San Joaquin Valley, an area with some of the worst air quality in the United States. We must consider whether these state plans are sufficient'in law, specifically, whether the regulating United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) erred in approving California’s State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) to comply with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) enacted under the federal Clean Air Act…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Skaff v. Meridien North America Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Epc of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Utah Physic. for Healthy Env't v. Diesel Power GearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  3. Ammex, Inc. v. Gordon WenkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Association of Irritated Residents v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API