Legal Opinion

State v. Alvarez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1988No. CF 87-516; CF 87-515; CA A46557; A47174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence obtained under a search warrant. We reverse. The trial court ruled that the supporting affidavit did not show firsthand knowledge by the confidential informant (first informant) and did not adequately set out the reliability and basis of knowledge by the unnamed third party informant (termed by the state as “unwitting citizen” and referred to hereafter as “second informant”).

The affiant, Tyrrell, a police officer for over nine years, three years with the Oregon State Police Narcotics Unit, indicated that he had established an on-going…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. AshkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API