Logan Et Ux. v. Illinois River Dev. Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rehearing Denied October 8, 1929.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
(280 P. 123.)
IN BANC. Defendant has presented a petition for rehearing stressing two points. First, it takes issue with the former opinion in regard to attorneys' fees. We think sufficient was said in the former opinion in that behalf: Advance Sheets, July 9, 1929, Vol. 8, No. 21 (279 P. 274). Unless some other error was found in the record defendant has no cause to complain of the action of the court below as to the amount allowed for attorneys' fees in case redemption should be made: James v. Ward, 96 Or. 667 (190 P. 1105).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Logan v. Illinois Rivers Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Reeder v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.