Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing’.

The appellants and defendants below, Charles F. and Adolph Schmidt, were the qualified executors of the will of their father, Ferdinand Schmidt, who died August 18, 1919,. a resident of Jefferson county, and his mil was probated in the county court of that county on November 4 the- same year. The testator was the owner of a farm near the old town of Jefferstown containing 1421/3 acres. He made small specific bequests to a surviving daughter and to the two surviving adult children of a deceased daughter and devised the farm to his surviving wife for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. CanslerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  2. Tapp v. NockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Huber v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. National Finance Corp. v. Robinson & Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rounds v. Owensboro Ferry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Ferguson v. Harris & SpeakesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Consolidated Realty Co. v. Richmond Hotel & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Rogers Bros. Coal Company v. DayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Guill v. PughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API