Legal Opinion
Miller v. Spicer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 11, 1978No. 56132, 56133PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Appellee brought suit against the Millers and by amendment added as defendants the Millers’ liability insurance carrier, appellant North River Insurance Co. From an adverse jury verdict, North River Ins. Co. alone appeals. Held:
1. The evidence authorized the jury to conclude that the appellee was a "pedestrian” within the meaning of Code Ann. § 56-3402b (g), which was correctly given by the trial court in its charge to the jury. Appellee was therefore an "insured,” as contemplated by Code Ann. § 56-3402b (b), under the policy issued by appellant. Therefore, we will affirm so…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Sheffield v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- National-Ben Franklin Insurance v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GoldwireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
3Cited by19 opinions
- Binns v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Cincinnati Insurance v. ReybitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.