Paige v. Saint Andrew's Roman Catholic Church Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Dissent
CALLAHAN, C. J.,
with whom MCDONALD, J., joins, dissenting. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to establish that the negligence of the defendant, St. Andrew’s Roman Catholic Church Corporation, was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Thelonious Paige. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
An essential element of any successful negligence action is the establishment of the defendant’s conduct as a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injury. Hearl v. Waterbury Young Men’s Christian Assn., 187 Conn. 1, 4, 444 A.2d 211…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bartholomew v. SchweizerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.