Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paige v. Saint Andrew's Roman Catholic Church Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 15, 1998No. SC 15866Published

1Dissent

CALLAHAN, C. J.,

with whom MCDONALD, J., joins, dissenting. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to establish that the negligence of the defendant, St. Andrew’s Roman Catholic Church Corporation, was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Thelonious Paige. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

An essential element of any successful negligence action is the establishment of the defendant’s conduct as a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injury. Hearl v. Waterbury Young Men’s Christian Assn., 187 Conn. 1, 4, 444 A.2d 211…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Bartholomew v. SchweizerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API