Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Welch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-1462Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPariente, Judge

I concur in the majority’s opinion concerning the error in sentencing. However, I would reverse the defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial based on the impermissible comment by a police officer on the defendant’s exercise of his right to silence.

In response to questioning by the state, the police officer testified about his actions after the victims identified the defendant as the assailant:

I approached him and advised him that I was there investigating an incident that occurred. He then advised me that he didn’t know anything about an incident. He spontaneously advised me that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API