Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ace Wire & Cable Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1982Published

1Dissent

Mangano, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm the order appealed from. It has been consistently held that an insured may not prevail on an insurance claim for loss caused by *137employee dishonesty when the claim is based solely on an inventory computation (Teviro Casuals v American Home Assur. Co., 81 AD2d 814, affd 54 NY2d 915). In my view, the proof adduced by the plaintiffs in the case, at bar was a “unit reconciliation of stock” (see Teviro Casuals v American Home Assur. Co., 81 AD2d 814, 815, supra), which has been clearly held to be nothing more than an inventory computation (supra). In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teviro Casuals, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. American Thermostat Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Teviro Casuals, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API