People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant forfeited his right to challenge either the alleged untimeliness or the improper service of the notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 by pleading guilty (see, People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1; see also, People v Campbell, 73 NY2d 481, 486; People v Prescott, 66 NY2d 216, 219-220, cert denied 475 US 1150; People v McBayne, 160 AD2d 735; People v Marinetti, 148 AD2d 550, lv denied 74 NY2d 666).
There is no merit to defendant’s contention that his oral and written statements should have been suppressed because he did not knowingly and intelligently waive…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BucknorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. FlakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. KlumbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. StewardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.