Legal Opinion

Ham v. Parkerson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

While a written contract cannot be altered by parol, yet if its execution was the result of fraud, accident or mistake, such fact may be pleaded and proved by parol in avoidance thereof..Held, that, to a suit on the bond such facts might be pleaded and proved by parol, and would constitute a good defence. 54 Ga., 289; 52 Ib., 149; 56 Ib., 31, 32; 59 Ib., 850.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. Universal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dolvin v. American Harrow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Elliott v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Barrie v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Branan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. White & Hamilton Lumber Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API