Legal Opinion

FMC Finance Corp. v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. A8002-00827; CA A25949Published

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover a deficiency judgment after defendants defaulted on an equipment lease contract.1 Defendants affirmatively alleged accord and satisfaction and, alternatively, urged that, under the facts of this case, plaintiffs notice of sale of the collateral was unreasonable. After trial to the court, judgment was entered for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. We affirm.

Defendants are involved in landscape contracting and gardening. In order to obtain a hydrograsser,2 defendant Craig, on behalf of defendant John M. Craig Complete Gardening Service, Inc., signed a lease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. All-States Leasing Co. v. OchsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Williams v. LeathamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. CanuttOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Benton-Lincoln Credit Service, Inc. v. GiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Schlatter v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API