Legal Opinion

Iglehart v. Armiger

High Court of Chancery of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1829Published

This bill was filed on the 30th of September 1828, by James Iglehart, Robert S. Bryan, and William McParlan, against Benjamin Armiger, Richard G. Hutton, Richard D. Hill, Rezin Estep, John S. Selby, and JVicholas I. WatJdns.

Read the full summary

This bill was filed on the 30th of September 1828, by James Iglehart, Robert S. Bryan, and William McParlan, against Benjamin Armiger, Richard G. Hutton, Richard D. Hill, Rezin Estep, John S. Selby, and JVicholas I. WatJdns. The' object of the bill was to have a tract of land which had been sold by the plaintiff Iglehart, as trustee under a decree of . this court, and purchased by the defendant Armiger, resold for the payment of the balance of the purchase money; on the ground, that the equitable lien of the vendor still subsisted in full force and unimpaired. The bill-stated, that the bonds,…

1Opinion of the Court

Bland, Chancellor

This case standing ready for hearing, and having been submitted on the notes of the plaintiffs’ solicitor, the proceedings were read and considered.

The circumstances and facts are these. Joseph Selby died intestate, seized of a certain tract of land which descended to his *520children. One of whom, Jemima, with her husband John Cross, and others, filed a bill in this court, alleging, that the estate, which had so descended to them, would not admit of partition without loss ; and therefore prayed, that it might be sold and the proceeds divided among them. It was decreed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Jackson ex dem. Norton v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  4. Green v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  5. Runyan v. MersereauNew York Supreme Court · 1814

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API