Berkowitz v. A.C. & S., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about June 18, 2001 (Appeal Nos. 5104, 5105, 5106, 5107, 5108, 5109 and 5111) and July 12, 2001 (Appeal No. 5110), which denied defendants-appellants’ motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The inability of certain of plaintiffs to identify defendant Worthington as the manufacturer of the pumps containing the asbestos to which they were allegedly exposed does not require dismissal of their actions, where defendants’ own witness conceded that Worthington pumps were on a very high percentage…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rogers v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Salerno v. Garlock Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by23 opinions
- The Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation , Doris Kay Dummitt v. A.W. Chesterton , The Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation , Joann H. Suttner v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Konstantin v. 630 Third Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Tronlone v. Lac d'Amiante Du Quebec, LteeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.